Instructor Policy Templates for AI Use

Nurturing Academic Integrity: The Importance of Instructor Policies on AI Use in the Classroom

As technology continues to advance at an unprecedented pace, its integration into various aspects of education becomes inevitable. One such innovation is Artificial Intelligence (AI), which has the potential to revolutionize the learning experience. However, as AI finds its way into classrooms, it becomes crucial for instructors to establish clear policies governing its use. In this blog post, we delve into the reasons why having an instructor policy on AI use is of utmost importance, particularly in safeguarding academic integrity, as many institutions do not yet have a blanket policy on AI use by learners.

Preserving Academic Rigor and Authenticity

Instructor policies on AI use ensure that the academic rigor and authenticity of a program remain intact. As students pursue their research and scholarly endeavors, it is vital that they rely on the application of their own knowledge, skills, and critical thinking abilities. By explicitly defining the boundaries of AI usage, instructors maintain the essence of academic work, fostering intellectual growth and originality among students. Such policies help prevent the potential erosion of academic standards, reinforcing the importance of individual contribution and scholarly integrity as learning institutions navigate the transition to accessible AI in society.

Fostering Ethical Engagement and Responsibility:

Incorporating AI into the classroom environment requires a strong emphasis on ethical engagement and responsibility. Instructors play a pivotal role in guiding students towards ethical AI usage. An instructor policy provides a framework for responsible AI integration, promoting transparency, accountability, and proper citation. By delineating the acceptable boundaries of AI utilization, instructors ensure that students develop a deep understanding of the ethical considerations associated with AI technology, encouraging responsible and informed decision-making.

Mitigating Academic Dishonesty and Plagiarism:

Academic dishonesty, including plagiarism, poses a significant threat to the integrity of any academic institution. The advent of AI introduces new challenges, as students may be tempted to utilize AI-powered tools to complete assignments, assessments, or even generate content. However, instructors must also rethink the value of their activities and assessments. An instructor policy acts as a deterrent against such misconduct, making it clear that AI usage without proper authorization is considered a violation of academic integrity. By explicitly addressing AI use and mandating proper citation, instructors provide a strong foundation for academic honesty, fostering an environment of trust and credibility while creating a culture of accountable people, rather than attempting to hold all people accountable.

Promoting Technological Literacy and Critical Thinking:

An instructor policy on AI use empowers students to develop essential technological literacy and critical thinking skills. By setting guidelines and limitations, instructors encourage students to engage with AI tools critically. Students are prompted to reflect on the advantages and limitations of AI, its potential biases, and its impact on various academic disciplines. This engagement cultivates a deeper understanding of AI's role, enabling students to effectively navigate its applications within their field of study. By encouraging critical thinking, instructors equip students with the skills necessary to evaluate AI-generated outputs and discern their authenticity and appropriateness.

Incorporating AI into the classroom environment brings both opportunities and challenges. By establishing instructor policies on AI use, institutions ensure that academic integrity remains at the forefront of the learning process. These policies preserve the essence of academic rigor, foster ethical engagement, mitigate academic dishonesty, and promote technological literacy and critical thinking skills. As AI continues to shape the educational landscape, clear policies on its usage empower students to embrace its potential while upholding the highest standards of academic integrity. 

Template Examples for Instructor Policies:


Policy 1: Rejection of AI Use in the Classroom

(Instructor/Institution) strictly prohibits the use of AI, such as ChatGPT, in the classroom, considering it equivalent to cheating and plagiarism. All students are expected to rely solely on the application of their own knowledge, skills, and efforts in completing academic tasks, assessments, and assignments. The use of AI in any form, without explicit authorization, will be deemed a violation of academic integrity and subject to appropriate disciplinary action.

Policy 2: Limited Use of AI with Proper Citation and Accreditation

(Instructor/Institution) allows the use of AI on tasks and activities as permitted by the instructor (see assignment instructions), provided that students adhere to the guidelines of proper citation and accreditation. Students are required to acknowledge the use of AI tools, such as ChatGPT, in their work, clearly indicating the extent of their AI involvement. Failure to provide appropriate attribution will be considered a violation of academic honesty, resulting in consequences outlined in (Institution's) academic integrity policy.

Policy 3: Liberal AI Use for Brainstorming and Idea Generation with Proper Citation

(Instructor/Institution) supports the use of AI in the classroom for brainstorming, idea generation, tutoring, and related tasks, provided that proper citation and referencing are observed. Students are encouraged to utilize AI tools, like ChatGPT, as a means to explore and enhance their creative thinking process. However, it is essential to acknowledge the AI's contribution by properly citing its use in any academic work or presentation. Failure to provide adequate attribution may be considered a breach of academic integrity and will be subject to appropriate consequences as outlined by the university.